Skip to main content

Media Advisory: Malawi High Court to Determine Constitutionality of Sweeping Exercises

By 22 February 2019January 3rd, 2023Criminal Justice, Criminal Justice Criminal Law Reform, Malawi6 min read

Blantyre, Malawi – On Monday, the Malawi High Court, Judge Zione Ntaba, will hear a case in which the Applicants are challenging the police practice of conducting arbitrary mass arrests under the guise of crime prevention.

The case is supported by the Centre for Human Rights Education, Advice and Assistance (CHREAA) and the Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC). Both organisations have long campaigned against unlawful police arrest practices and have challenged the constitutionality of overly broad catch-all offences used to justify arbitrary arrests. The Applicants are represented by Chikondi Chijozi.

“For far too long, people have been unfairly subjected to the criminal justice system in the absence of any criminal offence having been committed and in the absence of any criminal intent,” says Victor Mhango, Executive Director of CHREAA. “Practices of arbitrary mass arrests are blatantly unlawful, yet they continue unhindered simply because those arrested cannot afford to challenge these arrests.”

“The Malawi Courts have previously expressed their dismay at the lack of procedural compliance entailed by such mass arrests and the consequent rights violations,” says Anneke Meerkotter, Litigation Director at SALC. “This case provides an opportunity for the court to explicitly declare the practice of arbitrary police sweeping exercises unlawful and to compel the police to remedy these practices in line with their constitutional mandate to protect human rights.”

When:             Monday, 25 February 2019

Where:           Zomba High Court, Malawi

What:             State v Officer in Charge, Kasungu Police Station and Inspector General of

Police, Ex Parte Henry Banda and 2 Others, High Court of Malawi, Zomba District Registry, Judicial Review Case No. 28 of 2018


The Applicants in this case are Henry Banda, Ishmael Mwale and Sikweya Supiyani who were arrested in Kasungu District at around 11 pm on 27 March 2018 after Malawi police a sweeping exercise in the District. At the time of their arrest, Banda was working as a DJ at a local bar, Mwale was having a drink at a club, and Supiyani was selling Kanyenya (fish kebabs) at a bar. They were not informed of the reasons of their arrest, despite specifically demanding this information from the police. After spending a night in police cells, they were taken to court, charged and convicted of the offence of being a rogue and vagabond contrary to section 184(1)(b) of the Penal Code upon their own guilty plea. They have launched a separate case challenging the constitutionality of section 184(1)(b) of the Penal Code which provides that “every suspected person or reputed thief who has no visible means of subsistence and cannot give a good account of himself” shall be deemed a rogue and vagabond.

The Applicants request a judicial review of the following decisions made by the police:

  1. The indiscriminate sweeping exercise and arrest of the Applicants;
  2. The failure to promptly give reasons for the Applicants’ arrest and detention; and
  3. Coercing the Applicants to plead guilty to the offence of being a rogue and vagabond.


The Applicants seek the following relief:

  1. A declaration that the police’s indiscriminate sweeping exercise and arrest is unconstitutional.
  2. A declaration that the police’s indiscriminate sweeping exercise and arrest is contrary to their duty to protect human rights.
  3. An order compelling the police to develop proper guidelines for sweeping exercises which shall ensure full protection of human rights.
  4. A declaration that the failure by the police to promptly inform the Applicants of the charges against them at the time of arrest and detention is unlawful and unconstitutional.
  5. A declaration that the conduct of the police in forcing the Applicants at the police station to plead guilty to the offence of rogue and vagabond and threatening them with possible detention in prison if they failed to do so is unconstitutional.


One of the enduring legacies of colonialism in Africa is the police practice of arbitrary mass arrests. These so-called ‘sweeping’ or ‘swooping’ exercises are typically conducted by police over weekends and at night. Such sweeping exercises tend to have very general objectives, meaning that persons are arrested, for example, for being on the street at night, even when they have not committed a specific offence or engaged in suspicious activity. Sweeping exercises are targeted at whoever the police deem to be ‘undesirable’, including sex workers, vendors, street children, persons who beg and persons with disabilities.

Often the objective of sweeping exercises is to assure the public that sufficient attention is paid to crime prevention. However, in reality people find themselves imprisoned or detained in potentially life-threatening conditions, especially in cases where they cannot afford bail or the fine, even when there is no proof of an actual offence having been committed.

The African Commission on Human and People’s Rights’ Guidelines on Arrest, as with most Criminal Procedure Codes, only allows arrest without a warrant if there arereasonable grounds to suspect that a person has committed or is about to commit an arrestable offence. The African Commission’s Principles on the Decriminalisation of Petty Offences in Africa further notes that the enforcement of petty offences through mass arrests is inconsistent with the right to dignity and freedom from ill treatment.

The persistence of these practices of mass arrests is facilitated through various vague and outdated Penal Code offences that serve to give these arrests a veneer of lawfulness, including common nuisance, being idle and disorderly, soliciting for an immoral purpose, being a rogue and vagabond, loiteringand breach of peace.

The Applicants submit that the community can only maintain trust in the police, if the police behaves in a rights-oriented, ethical, accountable and objective manner. The Applicants submit that sweeping exercises in which persons are arrested for minor offences and non-criminal behaviour are unreasonable, unlawful and in violation of human rights. Such arrest practices have not proved to lead to reductions in serious crime and place a strain on the resources of police, courts and prisons.

More information on the case is available on Also follow @CHREAAMalawi and @follow_SALC for updated on the case.

Both organisations are part of the Campaign for Decriminalisation and Reclassification of Petty Offences in Africa – more information on the campaign is available at

Leave a Reply