Promoting Human Rights & Rule of Law in South Africa
16 May, 2013
Johannesburg, 16 May – Lesotho’s Constitutional Court today struck a serious blow against women’s rights and gender equality by upholding a discriminatory section of the Chieftainship Act, which denies all daughters the right to succeed to chieftainship solely due to their gender.
“This is a dark day for women in Lesotho. The Constitutional Court has basically re-affirmed the view that women are second-class citizens in Lesotho,” said Priti Patel, Deputy Director of the Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC), which intervened as a friend of the court (amicus curiae) in the matter. “In recent years, Lesotho had made significant strides towards eradicating gender discrimination, by ending male marital power among other things. Today’s decision is a significant step backwards for Lesotho in achieving gender equality.”
The case, Masupha v The Senior Resident Magistrate for the Subordinate Court of Berea and Others, was brought by Senate Masupha, the first-born child of a chief. Upon her father’s death, her mother was appointed as caretaker of the chieftainship. Following her mother’s death, the chieftainship was contested between Masupha’s uncle and half-brother. Masupha intervened seeking to succeed to the chieftainship as she was the first-born child. However, she was denied the right to succeed solely on the basis of her gender.
The decision goes against the trend on the continent of courts upholding the rights of women. The Constitutional Court in South Africa has struck down laws which deny women the right to inherit or succeed to chieftainship. In Botswana, the High Court recently struck down a customary law which denied women the right to inherit. Courts in Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, and Tanzania have also all struck down laws which deny women the right to inherit due solely to their gender.
The parties can appeal the judgment to the Court of Appeal.
For more information: Priti Patel, Deputy Director, SALC
+27 (0)11 587 5065 (o)
+27 (0)76 808 0505 (m)
For the judgment click here.
For background on the case click here.
Receive latest news from SALC
Latest Blog Posts
- SALC AND 229 NGOs CALL FOR UN BODIES TO RESPECT RIGHTS
- SALC IN THE NEWS: A human rights approach to addressing violence and discrimination against persons with albinism
- SALC STATEMENT: SALC WELCOMES THE RELEASE OF ANGOLAN HUMAN RIGTS ACTIVIST, JOSE MARCOS MAVUNGO
- [PRESS RELEASE] Unlawful and Expensive – Rights Bodies Criticize Ongoing Detention of Migrants
- SALC IN THE NEWS: DEJA VU FOR AFRICA-BASHIR GOES IN AND OUT OF UGANDA UNSCATHED
- COURT DIARY: Mareka and 22 Others v the Commander of the Lesotho Defence Force and Others
- Submission to the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights Regarding the Government of Namibia’s 6th Periodic Report
- UPR Pre-Session on Swaziland
- SALC ATTENDS THE 116th HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE SESSION FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF NAMIBIA’S STATE REPORT
- SALC Highlights Human Rights Concerns in Angola at the African Commission
- CONFIDENTIALITY UNDER THE REFUGEES ACT- A SHIELD FOR SUSPECTED PERPETRATORS OF GRAVE CRIMES
- UNDERSTANDING THE ZIMBABWE TORTURE CASE
- SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT IN ZIMBABWE TORTURE CASE: A VICTORY FOR LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
- SALC LETTER TO SOUTH AFRICAN GOVERNMENT- SUPPORTING THE FIGHT AGAINST IMPUNITY AND ENCOURAGING INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY
- SALC IN THE NEWS: SOUTH AFRICA CAUSES BLUSHES IN HANDLING OF POLICY ON SYRIA