Promoting Human Rights & Rule of Law in South Africa
16 May, 2013
Johannesburg, 16 May – Lesotho’s Constitutional Court today struck a serious blow against women’s rights and gender equality by upholding a discriminatory section of the Chieftainship Act, which denies all daughters the right to succeed to chieftainship solely due to their gender.
“This is a dark day for women in Lesotho. The Constitutional Court has basically re-affirmed the view that women are second-class citizens in Lesotho,” said Priti Patel, Deputy Director of the Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC), which intervened as a friend of the court (amicus curiae) in the matter. “In recent years, Lesotho had made significant strides towards eradicating gender discrimination, by ending male marital power among other things. Today’s decision is a significant step backwards for Lesotho in achieving gender equality.”
The case, Masupha v The Senior Resident Magistrate for the Subordinate Court of Berea and Others, was brought by Senate Masupha, the first-born child of a chief. Upon her father’s death, her mother was appointed as caretaker of the chieftainship. Following her mother’s death, the chieftainship was contested between Masupha’s uncle and half-brother. Masupha intervened seeking to succeed to the chieftainship as she was the first-born child. However, she was denied the right to succeed solely on the basis of her gender.
The decision goes against the trend on the continent of courts upholding the rights of women. The Constitutional Court in South Africa has struck down laws which deny women the right to inherit or succeed to chieftainship. In Botswana, the High Court recently struck down a customary law which denied women the right to inherit. Courts in Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, and Tanzania have also all struck down laws which deny women the right to inherit due solely to their gender.
The parties can appeal the judgment to the Court of Appeal.
For more information: Priti Patel, Deputy Director, SALC
+27 (0)11 587 5065 (o)
+27 (0)76 808 0505 (m)
For the judgment click here.
For background on the case click here.
Receive latest news from SALC
Latest Blog Posts
- WHY BRICS MUST SUPPORT THE ARMS TRADE TREATY
- ZIMBABWEAN REGISTRAR GENERAL MAKES ABSURD CALL FOR A GOVERNMENT BAN ON CONTRACEPTIVES
- THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE LIVES-CORPORATE COMPLICITY IN ACTS OF TORTURE IN IRAQ CHALLENGED IN A US COURT
- AFTER 12 YEARS OF EXISTENCE-WHERE DOES THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT STAND?
- The Personal Cost of Swaziland’s Political Crisis
- SALC IN THE NEWS: ISRAELI WAR TACTICS IGNORE CHILDREN’S INNOCENCE
- JOINT STATEMENT: CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS CONDEMN UNREASONABLE SENTENCE OF PROMINENT SWAZILAND ACTIVISTS
- SALC IN THE NEWS: AFRICAN UNION GIVES IMMUNITY TO HEADS OF STATE BY SUBTERFUGE
- STATEMENT: IBA AND SALC EXPRESS ALARM AT AU’S ENDORSEMENT OF IMMUNITY FOR HEADS OF STATE
- NEWS RELEASE: TWO ZAMBIAN MEN ACCUSED OF “CARNAL KNOWLEDGE AGAINST THE ORDER OF NATURE” ACQUITTED AFTER SPENDING MORE THAN A YEAR IN JAIL
- SALC LITIGATION MANUAL: LITIGATING CASES INVOLVING VIOLATIONS OF SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RIGHTS
- NEWS RELEASE: SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL ORDERS SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE TO INVESTIGATE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY COMMITTED IN ZIMBABWE
- International Criminal Justice in 2013, a Year of Ups and Downs
- No Justice for the Poor: A Preliminary Study of the Law and Practice Relating to Arrests for Nuisance-Related Offences in Blantyre, Malawi
- Media Advisory: No Justice for the Poor-Human Rights Groups Report Highlights Use of Outdated Vagrancy Laws by Police in Malawi
- UNDERSTANDING THE ZIMBABWE TORTURE CASE
- SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT IN ZIMBABWE TORTURE CASE: A VICTORY FOR LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE
- SALC LETTER TO SOUTH AFRICAN GOVERNMENT- SUPPORTING THE FIGHT AGAINST IMPUNITY AND ENCOURAGING INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY
- SALC IN THE NEWS: SOUTH AFRICA CAUSES BLUSHES IN HANDLING OF POLICY ON SYRIA
- MEDIA ADVISORY: TRIAL OF ZAMBIAN HIV ACTIVIST TO START IN LUSAKA