This SALC Policy Brief looks at the extent to which courts in the global South have carried through the idea of constitutional morality when asked to protect the rights of marginalised groups in society. Over the past 10 years, there has been a visible increase in the number of cases taken to courts seeking protection for the rights of lesbian, gay, and transgender individuals. These cases have had the effect of highlighting the extent to which the concept of constitutional morality is entrenched within the judiciary. Whilst the constitutions in all countries require that courts respect, protect and promote the rights entrenched in the constitution, it has been harder for the judiciary to adhere to this requirement where the legal issue at stake excites public opinion, and where the safeguards for judicial independence are fragile. This brief accordingly focuses specifically on how courts have recently dealt with issues pertaining to sexual orientation and gender identity. It is through such cases that we can assess to what extent courts have achieved the necessary maturity to protect constitutional morality.
22 Feb 2021 Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights Zimbabwe, Zambia, Mozambique, Malawi and Eswatini Salc : Tambudzai Gonese
The Global Gag Rule and Access to Abortion: Impact on law reform in Zimbabwe, Zambia, Mozambique, Eswatini and MalawiRead More
22 Feb 2021 Sex worker rights Botswana, Namibia, Eswatini, Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia, Zimbabwe Salc : Staff Writer Read More
21 Jan 2021 Freedom of Expression Zimbabwe Salc : Staff Writer Read More
15 Dec 2020 International Criminal Justice SADC Salc : Suzgo Lungu Read More
01 Dec 2020 Health Rights Angola Salc : Staff Writer Read More