The cases of Justice Paradza of Zimbabwe and Justice Hlophe of South Africa bear a striking resemblance. Both judges are accused of trying to influence their judicial colleagues to decide matters in favour of certain persons-Justice Paradza in favour of his business partner, while Justice Hlophe is accused of trying to get a decision in favour of the current President of South Africa who was facing corruption and fraud charges. Both allegations lie at the heart of judicial ethics. In both instances, only a full and transparent investigation will rescue the reputation of the judiciary. Even if the political climate in Zimbabwe changes for the better, uncomfortable questions still have to be answered.

Print Judging Judges in Zimbabwe the Case of Justice Paradza.pdf